Machine Learning–Driven Personalized Marketing and Consumer Purchase Intention
PDF

Keywords

Machine Learning
Personalized Marketing
Consumer Trust
Customer Satisfaction
Information Privacy Concerns
Purchase Intention
Responsible Artificial Intelligence

How to Cite

Machine Learning–Driven Personalized Marketing and Consumer Purchase Intention. (2026). Journal of Cortexplore, 1(4), 119-138. https://cortexplore.org/index.php/jce/article/view/35

Abstract

The rapid integration of machine learning (ML) into digital marketing has transformed how organizations personalize customer interactions and influence purchasing decisions. Despite widespread adoption of ML-driven recommendation systems, limited empirical evidence explains the psychological mechanisms through which personalized marketing shapes consumer purchase intention, particularly in emerging digital economies. This study develops and empirically validates an integrated behavioural model examining the relationships among Machine Learning–Driven Personalized Marketing (MLP), Consumer Trust (CT), Information Privacy Concerns (IPC), Customer Satisfaction (CS), and Purchase Intention (PI). Drawing upon Relationship Marketing Theory, the Technology Acceptance Model, Privacy Calculus Theory, Expectation Confirmation Theory, and the Stimulus–Organism–Response framework, the study proposes that consumer trust and customer satisfaction sequentially mediate the influence of personalized marketing on purchase intention, while information privacy concerns negatively affect trust. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 306 consumers with prior experience of AI-enabled digital shopping. Data were analysed using reliability analysis, validity assessment, correlation, multiple regression, and bootstrap mediation analysis. The findings indicate that machine learning–driven personalized marketing significantly enhances consumer trust, which subsequently improves customer satisfaction and strengthens purchase intention. Information privacy concerns exhibit a significant negative relationship with consumer trust. The mediation analysis further demonstrates that consumer trust and customer satisfaction fully and sequentially mediate the relationship between personalized marketing and purchase intention, indicating that technological sophistication alone does not directly influence consumer behaviour. Instead, consumers respond positively when AI-enabled personalization establishes credibility, satisfaction, and confidence in digital platforms. The study contributes to the growing literature on AI-enabled consumer behaviour by integrating technological, psychological, and behavioural perspectives within a single empirical framework. It also offers practical guidance for organizations seeking to implement responsible AI-driven personalization strategies that balance marketing effectiveness with consumer trust and privacy protection. The findings are particularly relevant for organizations operating in rapidly expanding digital marketplaces where sustainable competitive advantage increasingly depends upon ethical, transparent, and consumer-centred AI applications.

PDF

References

Aguirre, E., Mahr, D., Grewal, D., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2015). Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 91(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548

Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715

Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox—Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior: A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015). The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.001

Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Borgesius, F. J. Z. (2017). Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 46(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368

Cloarec, J. (2022). Privacy controls as an information source to reduce data poisoning in artificial intelligence-powered personalization. Journal of Business Research, 152, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.045

Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.104

Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Du, S., & Xie, C. (2021). Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 129, 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.024

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., ... Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689.

Feng, Y., & Kim, H. J. (2025). Decoding the trust matrix: Unraveling key predictors of consumer trust in AI-generated personalized advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 25(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2025.2468286

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gao, B., Wang, Y., Xie, H., Hu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence in advertising: Advancements, challenges, and ethical considerations in targeting, personalization,

content creation, and ad optimization. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231210759

Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057

Government of India. (2023). The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (Act No. 22 of 2023). Ministry of Law and Justice.

Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P. K., & Karahanna, E. (2020). The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00711-4

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2022). A framework for collaborative artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.001

Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jarek, K., & Mazurek, G. (2019). Marketing and artificial intelligence. Central European Business Review, 8(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.213

Jayapal, J. (2025). Unveiling the impact of AI-driven personalization on customer loyalty in online shopping: The moderating effects of privacy concerns. Journal of Promotion Management, 31(5), 865–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2025.2525099

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Komiak, S. Y. X., & Benbasat, I. (2006). The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 941–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760

Lee, S., Moon, W.-K., & Song, Y. G. (2025). Is it transparent or surveillant? The effects of personalized advertising and privacy policy on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2024.2417422

Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420

Leszczynska, M., & Baltag, D. (2024). “Can I have it non-personalised?” An empirical investigation of consumer willingness to share data for personalized services and ads. Journal of Consumer Policy, 47, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09568-9

Libai, B., Bart, Y., Gensler, S., Hofacker, C. F., Kaplan, A., Kötterheinrich, K., & Kroll, E. B. (2020). Brave new world? On AI and the management of customer relationships. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.002

Mariani, M. M., Perez-Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022). AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 39(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21619

Martin, K. D., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2017). Data privacy: Effects on customer and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 81(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0497

Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017). The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.

OECD. (2024). AI, data governance and privacy: Synergies and areas of international co-operation (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers No. 22). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2476b1a4-en

OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Legal Instruments.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405

Palmatier, R. W., & Martin, K. D. (2019). The intelligent marketer’s guide to data privacy: The impact of big data on customer trust. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03724-6

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920953847

Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson.

Segijn, C. M., & van Ooijen, I. (2020). Perceptions of techniques used to personalize messages across media in real time. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(5), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0682

Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019). Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019

Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, Article 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551

Shin, D. (2020). User perceptions of algorithmic decisions in the personalized AI system: Perceptual evaluation of fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357

Sundar, S. S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human–AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz026

Teepapal, T. (2025). AI-driven personalization: Unraveling consumer perceptions in social media engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, Article 108549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108549

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798–824. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00281

Zhang, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Proactive versus reactive personalization: Can customization of privacy enhance user experience? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(15), 1336–1347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543088

Zhu, Y.-Q., & Chang, J.-H. (2016). The key role of relevance in personalized advertisement: Examining its impact on perceptions of privacy invasion, self-awareness, and continuous use intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.048

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Cortexplore