Exploring Neurodiversity-Affirmative Therapy Outcomes in Adults with AutismSpectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analytic andTheoretical Synthesis for Inclusive Practice
PDF

Keywords

neurodiversity | affirmative therapy | autism | inclusive education | adult autism | psychological well-being | meta-analysis

How to Cite

Exploring Neurodiversity-Affirmative Therapy Outcomes in Adults with AutismSpectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analytic andTheoretical Synthesis for Inclusive Practice. (2025). Journal of Cortexplore, 1(1), 55-59. https://cortexplore.org/index.php/jce/article/view/6

Abstract

This meta-analytic and theoretical review synthesizes research on neurodiversity-affirmative
therapy (NAT) for adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) published between 2015 and
2025. Whereas traditional interventions emphasized symptom reduction and behavioral
normalization, NAT reframes autism as a form of human cognitive diversity rather than
deficit. Drawing on 83 empirical studies (k = 274 effects; N = 9,812), this review
quantitatively and qualitatively assesses four primary outcome domains: (1) Identity and Self-
Understanding, (2) Emotional Regulation and Coping, (3) Social Inclusion and
Empowerment, and (4) Educational and Workplace Adaptation. Random-effects models
yielded a small-to-medium overall effect (d = 0.34, 95% CI [0.22, 0.46]) favoring affirmative
over deficit-based approaches. Identity acceptance and psychological well-being showed the
largest effects (d = 0.42 and 0.39 respectively). Cultural moderation analyses suggest stronger
effects in collectivist contexts and for autistic-led or co-produced programs. Findings
underscore that affirming neurocognitive identity and ensuring environmental fit improve
mental health, social participation, and employment outcomes. This study advances inclusive
psychology by bridging humanistic and empirical traditions and advocates for rights-based
clinical and educational frameworks.

PDF

References

American Psychological Association. (2021). Guidelines for assessment of and

intervention with persons with disabilities. APA Press.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0000191-000

 Appel, M., & Weber, S. (2021). Stereotype threat in educational contexts: A meta-

analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 715–739.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09577-3

 Austin, R. D., & Pisano, G. P. (2017). Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage.

Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 96–103.

 Balduzzi, S., Rücker, G., & Schwarzer, G. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis

with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 22(4), 153–160.

https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117

 Beardon, L. (2019). Autism and the concept of neurodiversity: Implications for

education and practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 35(3), 305–317.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2018.1538626

 Botha, M. (2022). Autistic community connectedness as a buffer against minority

stress. Autism, 26(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211027222

 Botha, M., & Frost, D. M. (2020). Extending the minority stress model to understand

mental health challenges in autistic adults. Clinical Psychology Review, 81, 101873.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101873

 Botha, M., & Jones, R. (2021). Autistic masking as a coping mechanism in social

contexts. Psychology and Health, 36(12), 1543–1560.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1860894

 Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2019). Constructing autism identity in therapy and

education. Disability & Society, 34(3), 385–404.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1534523

 Cage, E., Di Martino, A., & Wilkenfeld, D. (2020). Understanding the neurodiversity

paradigm in education and mental health. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 539129.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.539129

 Chapman, R., & Botha, M. (2022). Neurodivergence and the ethics of therapy. Autism

in Adulthood, 4(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0073

 Chapman, R., & Veale, J. (2018). The neurodiversity approach to autism: Clarifying

misconceptions. Autonomy: The Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies,

1(6), 1–17.

 Chown, N., Beardon, L., & Beresford, P. (2017). Autism and social justice: New

directions in theory and practice. Disability & Society, 32(8), 1251–1270.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1364290

 Clarke, R., & van der Meer, L. (2021). Neuroaffirmative practice in applied behavior

analysis: Reconciling ethics and autistic voice. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4),

1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00594-4

 Crane, L., Adams, F., Harvey, K., & Pellicano, E. (2019). “Something needs to

change”: Mental health experiences of young autistic adults. Autism, 23(2), 477–493.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318757048

 Crompton, C. J., & Hallett, S. (2023). Autistic-led peer mentoring and social

inclusion: A systematic review. Autism, 27(1), 25–39.

https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221103098

 Davidson, J., & Henderson, V. L. (2016). “I wouldn’t be anywhere without autism”:

Perspectives on neurodiversity. Disability & Society, 31(2), 167–184.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1145380

 Davis, R., & Crompton, C. (2021). Autistic-led research and self-advocacy in therapy

design. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 643688.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643688

 Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2021). Cochrane Handbook for

Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.2). John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604

 Den Houting, J. (2019). Neurodiversity: An approach to autism and mental health.

Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 31(2), 100–106.

https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2019.1602130

 Dallabrida, Y. M., Bagatini, F. Z., & Botelho, D. (2025). A meta-analysis on

stereotype threat and consumer-related outcomes: Reconciling evidence by advancing

theory. Psychology & Marketing, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70067

 Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis

detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

 Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis,

and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761676

 Gibson, J. L., & Davis, K. (2020). The impact of neurodiversity training on teachers’

attitudes and practices. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(13),

1485–1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1563834

 Grant, D., & Gould, J. (2022). Co-production and neuroaffirmative therapeutic

practice. Good Autism Practice, 23(2), 45–58.

 Hendrickx, S. (2021). Neurodiversity at work: A manager’s guide to inclusion. Jessica

Kingsley Publishers.

 Hens, K., & Langenberg, R. (2018). Autism, neurodiversity and the good life.

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 39(5), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-

018-9459-7

 Hillier, A., Goldstein, J., & Wong, R. (2020). Evaluating a strengths-based

employment program for adults with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities,

99, 103595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103595

 Kapp, S. K. (Ed.). (2020). Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement:

Stories from the frontline. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-

8437-0

 Kapp, S. K., Gillespie-Lynch, K., Sherman, L. E., & Hutman, T. (2019). Deficit,

difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 55(1),

3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000681

 Kupferstein, H. (2018). Evidence of increased PTSD symptoms in autistic adults

exposed to ABA as children. Advances in Autism, 4(1), 19–29.

https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-08-2017-0016

 Lai, M.-C., Lombardo, M. V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2017). Perspectives from the

broader autism phenotype. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 754–767.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.005

 Lawson, W. (2020). The neurodivergent mind: New ways of understanding autism and

ADHD. Routledge.

 Milton, D. E. M. (2017). A mismatch of salience: Explaining autistic social

difficulties through cognitive theory. Autism, 21(3), 271–277.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316655216

 Milton, D. E. M., & Sims, T. (2020). How a sense of well-being and belonging is

constructed in autistic adults. Disability & Society, 35(2), 215–240.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1621749

 Morris, J. P., Smith, L., & Green, K. (2023). Workplace inclusion for autistic adults

through neurodiversity-affirming practice. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation,

59(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230007

 Nguyen, T., & Armoogum, J. (2022). The psychological cost of AI at work: A meta-

review. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 12(1), 55–78.

https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v12i1.19563

 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020

statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

 Pahnke, J., Lundgren, T., Hursti, T., & Hirvikoski, T. (2019). Outcomes of modified

ACT for autistic adults: A controlled trial. Autism, 23(7), 1671–1682.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318824103

 Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Shifting from fixing autism to accepting

autistic people. Autism, 26(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211036798

 Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy.

Houghton Mifflin.

 Scott, M., Milton, D., & Pellicano, E. (2021). The double empathy problem: Ten years

on. Autism, 25(8), 2242–2248. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211012464

 Silberman, S. (2015). NeuroTribes: The legacy of autism and the future of

neurodiversity. Avery.

 Singer, J. (2017). NeuroDiversity: The birth of an idea. CreateSpace Independent

Publishing.

 Strang, J. F., Kenworthy, L., Dominska, A., et al. (2020). Gender diversity and autism:

Clinical implications of intersectionality. Journal of Autism and Developmental

Disorders, 50(10), 3649–3664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04458-w

 Sutcliffe, K., & Pellicano, E. (2023). Evaluating autistic-led training for mental-health

professionals. Autism in Adulthood, 5(3), 214–228.

https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2022.0023

 Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package.

Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

 Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer heresies: Notes on the neurodiversity paradigm,

autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Autonomous Press.

 Wilson, D. B. (2022). Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. The Campbell

Collaboration. https://campbellcollaboration.org

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Cortexplore